Recently I got mad at myself over how much trouble I was having doing multiple steeps of gyokuro. The first steep would be great, but then … ugh. The problem wasn’t that the brewing temperature was too hot, it was something else.
I started paying attention to how much water the leaves sorb1, which is an attribute I for one haven’t seen discussed, but I’m increasingly convinced it’s really important. One thing is crystal clear: different genres of tea sorb radically different amounts of water.
It’s pretty obvious that when a tea sorbs a huge amount of water — hello gyokuro! — the temperature of the water you pour onto the swollen leaves is not the same as the temperature of the tea soup you’ll make from them. Not only that, but even with the brewing vessel lid off, a tea like gyokuro that swells up with water and normally steeps not too far above room temperature, will essentially continue brewing for a while after the tea soup is decanted, so in my experience subsequent steeps should be as fast as possible to avoid overbrewing.
Probably the toughest multi-steep brewing problem is a tea that sorbs lots of water and calls for brewing at 100℃. You can get closer to the objective by various techniques that help maintain a high temperature in the brewing vessel between steeps, but this means extraction will continue in the wet mass between steeps, which leads to a risk of overbrewing.
I’ve been trying to quantify how sorption-capable various genres of tea actually are. In the trials detailed below, I always began with 4 grams of tea leaves and did 4 steeps in a thin porcelain gaiwan, being careful to pour off all the tea soup in each steep. Not all brewing temperatures and steep timings were the same, because hey, I was making tea, not torturing the leaves. A 55ml gaiwan was always used unless otherwise noted. (The 10-minte simmer column in the table, thanks to a suggestion from Jens Dennig, was added several weeks into the project as a means of finding the absolute maximum takeup for a given tea; we’ll see how many of the teas get an entry in that column.)
It isn’t necessarily true that the leaves continue to get heavier after each successive steep. (See especially the final simmer for the Dooars CTC.) I think the reason for this is simple: as water enters the leaves, soluble solids exit the leaves. Since the total soluble solids in dry tea leaves amount to ~40% of tea leaves’ dry weight, if you exhausted 4g of tea leaves you’d be left with only 2.4g of the original leaves.
Speaking of the final simmer, when its weight is a lot higher than that of the fourth steep, that presumably means that four steeps with the brewing parameters I used didn’t come close to exhausting the tea. (See especially the table row for Lu Shan Yunwu at the “normal” 4g/55ml, where I feared making the green tea undrinkably bitter and astringent. The same weight of the same tea in a 120 ml gaiwan takes up a gram more water as of the fourth steep, not to mention tasting much better brewed less aggressively.)
| Tea description (brewed by me unless otherwise noted, using boiling water unless otherwise noted) | Gram weight after steep № | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Teas are sorted by maximum water takeup. Note that this favors the teas that have been subjected to a 10-minute simmer.) | (rinse) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 10-minute simmer, ~300ml5 | max wt. | ||
| Gyokuro (55℃) | - | 20 | 25 | 29 | 31 | 30 | |||
| Gyokuro (55℃) second trial2 | - | 16 | 25 | 29 | 30 | 30 | |||
| May 2022 Deep-steamed (fukamushi) sencha (80℃) | - | 16 | 26 | 28 | 28 | 28 | |||
| Dooars CTC3 black | - | 21 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 21 | |||
| Tippy Dian hong | - | 15 | 18 | 19 | 21 | - | |||
| Huangpian-only sheng pu’er | 8 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 19 | 19 | |||
| 2021 Dancong green (80℃) | - | 10 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 19 | |||
| Taiwan gaoshan oolong | 6 | 8 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 17 | |||
| Purple leaf Yunnan black | - | 10 | 14 | 16 | 17 | 17 | |||
| Jasmine pearl green tea | - | 8 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 19 | |||
| 2005 sheng puer | 9 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 17 | 19 | |||
| Early March 2020 Dian Lü (80℃) | - | 9 | 14 | 16 | 17 | 18 | |||
| 1970s Guang Yun Gong pieces | 8 | 12 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 16 | |||
| 2014 Da Hu Sai sheng pu’er | 9 | 12 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | |||
| Nepal black: twisted, partly broken leaves | - | 12 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | |||
| 2021 Dancong black | - | 10 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 17 | |||
| Hong Kong wet-stored loose pu’er | 11 | 13 | 15 | 15 | 15 | - | |||
| Aged, stemmy Dong Ding oolong | 8 | 11 | 13 | 14 | 15 | - | |||
| 1992 Fu Lu Shou Xi sheng pu’er brick | 6 | 10 | 13 | 15 | 15 | 18 | |||
| 2018 Mojun Fucha Fu Zhuan dark tea brick | 10 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 17 | |||
| 2002 Liubao | 9 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | |||
| 2002(?) Lu’an heicha | 9 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 16 | |||
| Ten Ren ginseng oolong | 7 | 11 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 16 | |||
| 2019 Heng Tong Hao shu pu’er | 7 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 15 | 15 | |||
| Dark roast Shan Lin Xi oolong | 7 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 16 | |||
| Ya Shi Xiang (brewed by Thomas)4 | 7.5 | 10 | 12 | 13.5 | 14 | - | |||
| Lu Shan Yunwu (80℃, 120ml) | - | 9 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 18 | |||
| Lu Shan Yunwu (80℃) | - | 8 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 18 | |||
| 2017 compressed Fuding white tea | 8 | 13 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 18 | |||
| Lu Shan Yunwu (80℃) | - | 8 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 18 | |||
| 2003 Fu Cha Ju Wuliang Shan shu pu’er | 9 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 13 | |||
| Lao cha tou | 6 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 11 | |||
So what determines the amount of steeping water a given tea takes up? It looks as if the way tea leaves are processed during manufacture dominates. Most strikingly, what gyokuro (the champion) shares with the runner-up fukamushi sencha is killgreen by steaming. At the low-sorption end of the scale, lao cha tou stands alone while Fu Cha Ju old shupu is heavier and “normal” shu pu’er (Heng Tong Hao) what you might call lower middle class. As to other possible factors in the rankings of the various teas, I’m reluctant to say more until I have 10-minute simmer measurements for more of them.
What do you think? You can explore ideas of what might account for the variation in weight by interactively highlighting tea attributes that seem promising.
1Eric Scott has pointed out to me that we’re not just talking about absorption of water, that adsorption is important too. He conjectures that because leaves harvested when they’re young and small, like gyokuro, have a higher surface-to-mass ratio, they might adsorb more water per gram of dry leaf. But it seems to me that this idea is undermined by the fact that the fourth-steep weight of the huangpian-only sample—by definition made from huge leaves—is among the highest of all teas tested.
2Because gyokuro is such an outlier, an astute reader suggested that I try it again. As you can see, the result isn’t materially different.
3Admittedly CTC is an unlikely candidate for gongfu brewing, but we want to know why a given tea holds the amount of water it does, and it occurred to me that lots of small particles might take up water faster than a few intact leaves.
4Because we have no simmer column for this tea, and because I suspect Thomas was trying to avoid pushing a dancong too hard to avoid its notorious astringency, the apparent low water uptake should be taken with a grain of salt.
5Warning: if a tea lacks an entry in this column, its sort order in the table, which is based on its maximum weight, may be misleading.
<perin@acm.org> @babelcarp on Mastodon
First published: May 4, 2022
Latest revision: July 8, 2022